Azure Information Protection

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. App specific visual markings in Unified Labeling client

    Add the ability to set different visual markings for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook in AIP Unified Labeling client, as described here for AIP Classic client: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/information-protection/configure-policy-markings#setting-different-visual-markings-for-word-excel-powerpoint-and-outlook

    38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  9 comments  ·  Visual Marking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Labeling Admin Audit Log

    Right now you cannot search for administrative Event regarding Unified Labeling in Office 365 Admn portal Audit Log Search.

    83 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Logs & Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Classification bar should be available in the Windows Office 365 built in integration with sensitivity labels

    Like with the AIP add-in which have a classification bar in addition to the labels under the "Sensitivity" button. The request is that as part of the built in integration with the Windows Office 365 apps for sensitivity labeling, the bar will be available as well

    38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Use AI to give recommendation how to classify

    It would be cool to have AI in the Background that learns from already classified Documents of one Department or Businessline how critical expressions are related to each other and lead into a certain classification. With this AI-Knowledge the System would be able to recommend or auto-classify new or not yet classified old Files in the right way. This would lead into less manual confiured sensitifity types.
    Focus of this idea should be the improvement of the recommendations in a first step without the need of manual configuration.

    20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Limit actions done by Macros

    There are many request from customers to limit the actions that can be done with Macros.
    Right now, if [Allow Macros] is granted as a usage right, any kind of Macro can be executed (like Macros to copy data from an AIP protected file and paste it into a text file which is not protected).

    Therefore, customer's request is to be able to limit the actions that can be done with Macros on AIP protected files.
    For example, allow only "Read-Only" Macros.

    Please consider the idea of implementing a feature that would allow customers to limit the actions that can…

    30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Show who applied the classification label and when in the Unified Labeling client

    If a document/email has been classified/labeled using the AIP Classic client, the AIP Classic client shows the email address of the user who applied that label (when hovering the mouse on it in the Information Protection Bar).

    This feature is not present anymore in the UL client, reportedly "by design".

    It would be useful to have as a configuration option in MSCC the capability to include among the properties of the document/email, also the name / email address of the user who applied at least the last/current classification label, and the date it was applied.

    (Just as a reference, our…

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Persistent Outlook labels

    Include sensitivity label metadata in Outlook emails such that they persist when a user without AIP forwards or replies. Currently, if an external recipient replies to an email that our organization has labeled, it returns without a label and our users must select and add the label again when replying.

    9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Support additional filetypes for AIP with MCAS Integration

    We would like MCAS AIP Integration to support older Office formats (.doc .ppt .xls) as well as .csv and image formats (.jpg, .jpeg, .png) and .txt

    7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  0 comments  ·  Applications and File Types  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Configuration of UL "Label Advanced Settings" and "Label Policy Settings"

    Currently the configuration of Unified Labelling "Label advanced settings" & "label policy settings" is only available through PowerShell. For some organisations this is not ideal as not everyone has PowerShell skills, also, in my particular organisation getting a remote PowerShell session to the cloud is incredibly difficult and overly complex.
    Please consider adding this to the admin portals.

    12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Administration and Admin Portals  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Enforce classification when using send as attachment

    Enforce classification when using send as attachment option. Currently the classification is only enforced when the document is saved and this can potentially open up a loop hole for sending out unclassified documents.

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Allow Keyword dictionaries to be used with 'AIP scanner' as conditions

    Currently the AIP 'standard' client does not have support for adding keyword lists, or a practical way to add them besides adding single conditions with individual strings one at a time. The Unified Labeling client contains both options to add keywords comma separated, and keyword lists. This is great however currently the UL AIP client does not have a Scanner option. Thus, AIP scanner relies on AIP standard client and its labels and conditions that do not contain an option for adding vast numbers of keywords besides tedious single conditons. In the case of 'thousands' of keywords this is simply…

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Support for UL "Label Advanced Settings" and "Label Policy Settings" in MacOS, iOS and Android

    Currently only the windows UL client supports these settings. This means that something as simple as a different default label for Outlook is only available in Windows. Please implement this ASAP as it is the main reason why UL is not ready for production environments, since a different label for Outlook (among other settings) is essential for end-users.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Office Clients  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Support for disconnected environments with the AIP Unified Labeling Scanner

    In special customer scenarios, systems might be completely disconnected and not have direct or indirect access to the cloud service. This is supported in the AIP Classic scanner. We need an option to distribute the policy manually in the disconnected environment.
    Even if this is some kind of niche scenario, it might be important for many public sector or highly regulated customers.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Scanning and Migration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Users have an easy way to find and install the AIP app from the Microsoft Store

    When a user (in a company that hasn't deployed AIP) receives content protected with AIP in PPDF, PJPG, PTXT, PFILE or other such format, they have to install the AIP app to open it.
    At this point, users have to find and download the app on their own, which involves potential risks. Publishing the AIP app on the app store, and associating it with the relevant file extensions, would allow users to automatically find, download and install the application needed to open those files.

    17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Applications and File Types  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Label Creation Gui for Admins.

    Instead of using Powershell scripts, develop an Admin Gui for Mass Creation of Label / permission , incl. csv import.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  1 comment  ·  Administration and Admin Portals  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Free text field so that we can write our own messages on the warn, justify, or block pop-up messages for specific labels

    AIP is a good product but the customer messaging on functionality such as the "Confirmation Required" to warn, justify, or block pop-up messages for specific labels is too limited. cannot this be a free text field so that we can write our own messages?

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. AIP Viewer - configurable link in "Learn More"

    In the AIP client I can configure the "Tell Me More" link in Help & Feedback to point to an internal website via an advanced configuration setting.
    The AIP Viewer has a "Learn More" link which takes me to an external Microsoft site. I'd like to be able to configure this link to point to my own site.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Authorize AIP Super User Role with Priviled Identity Management (PIM)

    The authorization for the activation of the high-risk role AIP super user should be managed by Azure Privileged Identiy Management. Of course you should also be able to assign users to the role.

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Enforce classification when a document is opened

    Enforce classification and/or protection as soon as a document is opened, even for a new document, instead of when the document is saved.

    This can help in applying classification/protection to documents even while they are being drafted and yet to be saved.

    With the current behavior there is a gap where a user can send a file directly via email using the send as email attachment option if the document is not saved. Please see attached snapshots

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Dynamic token injection into custom email headers

    Building on this item ( https://msip.uservoice.com/forums/600097-azure-information-protection/suggestions/33963844-allow-custom-email-x-headers-defined-per-label ) there is a need to dynamically inject a token into the custom header.
    IE. Embedding the user's email address into the custom header is a requirement for all Australian Government customers (~1m users nationally).

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Labelling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 15 16
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base